How high is your mountain?
Sorry, no LIVE Chat tonight … back, at the usual time next week!
______________________________
How high is your mountain?
Lee gently reminded me that I have used a similar post title before; and I have!
That’s because, this is the second time that the 7 Millionaires … In Training! (and, hopefully, you) have taken a long, hard look at your Number …
… in fact, you have probably put more time and energy into Your Number (and, Your Life’s Purpose) than I did, way back in 1998!
It will be well worth the effort …
Before we go on, let me remind you that we measure the ’steepness’ of a financial curve by its Required Annual Compound Growth Rate – and, here is what the 7MITs’ look like (using the 7MITs’ actual current net worth as a starting point):
Two things to notice:
1. How some of the Numbers have changed a LOT since the last time the 7MITs tried this exercise (while others haven’t changed at all), so it pays to put serious effort into understanding both your Life’s Purpose and your ensuing WANTS v NEEDS, and
2. The compound growth rate required to get from here (your current Net Worth) to there (your Number) by when (your Date).
Why is this significant?
Because it tells you a lot about the investment choices, hence risks you need to take:
The Average Compound Growth Rate is a measure of how ’steep’ a financial mountain you need to climb … and, that should tell you whether you need a train, a fast car, or a helicopter to get you to the very top in time.
According to Michael Masterson in his book Seven Years To Seven Figures:
Required Compound Investments
Growth Rate Required
4% CD’s
8% Index Funds
15% Stocks
30% Real-Estate together with Stocks
45% Real-Estate together with Stocks and Small Businesses
50%+ Start Your Own Business
So, how big is your mountain? More importantly, how steep the gradient?
And, are you prepared to try a new mode of transport, if that’s what is required?
Are you?
BTW: For convenience, here are links to each of the 7MITs recently updated NetworthIQ Profiles:
Lee http://www.networthiq.com/people/topekac1
Diane https://www.networthiq.com/people/Diane
Mark https://www.networthiq.com/people/markwws
Josh https://www.networthiq.com/people/jaushwa/2008/11
Ryan https://www.networthiq.com/people/PassiveSeeker
Debbie https://www.networthiq.com/people/debtfreedom/2008/10
Scott https://www.networthiq.com/people/abundantlife








I know how I got my first number. I knew someone who had $3M in the bank and no longer worked and thought they were set for life. I then talked to a friend who was a financial planner because I didn’t think $3M was really all that much but the planner said that it was enough to have a decent withdrawal for living on (I believe we were thinking of around $100k for the area of the country we were in) and not touch the principle.
As for the next numbers, I went through a wish-list based on the 4-hour Work Week book (4hww.com) that gave us a clear way to think about our dreams in terms of what it would really cost to do what we think it would cost “millions” to do. (For example, what does airline from Po-dunk USA to Paris cost? What kind of accomodations would I really stay in and for how long, what is the cost of a rental car? How much of this can I get from a travel agent?) As a cost analyst, I was well familiar with the need to get rough estimates by making sure I considered all the parts (doing a grass roots estimate by building up from these pieces) so that I wouldn’t get caught unaware later. The numbers now are still rough estimates based on some pretty-fleshed-out plans, analogies to similar items, some basis on historical facts, and a lot of assumptions (tho I did play some “what-ifs” with assumptions about earnings from investments to get a range of what I would need).
The hardest thing to determine is time. I am basing that on a perceived need, realizing that if I am still alive, there is more time, yet needing to reach my number by 6 years for more personal reasons.
To reach that, I need to set some intermediate goals next.