401 Que?
Photo credit: bigpicture.posterous.com
401 Que?
Very punny title, Ryan … I’ll leave the comedy to you, from now on π
Ryan raises the critical conundrum coherently (see, I’m already switching from puns to alliteration?!): when does it make sense to invest inside the tax-advantaged vehicle v outside? One gives you tax and employer-matching advantages and the other gives you earlier/easier access to your funds and (perhaps) better ‘investment’ choices … what would YOU do?
______________________________
Our official retirement funds are divided between three accounts:
– My wife’s California Teacher’s Pension Fund, which claims it is unaffected by the current fiscal crisis of California, is the result of steady stream of saving from 8 years of work (she’s now “retired”) and some employer matching, though I’m not sure how much.
Current Value: $34,000
– My 401K which is a rollover from about 4 different jobs, most non profit, some that matched my contributions, all that paid very little compensation.
Current Value: $6,000
– My SEPP that I formed when I started my company (It’s my company, so I guess it’s all matching funds!).
Current Value: $15,000
We lost about 45% of these funds over the past year. (hence the cartoon!)
As for what I’m going to do to get that money back? To be frank, I’m not sure!
For starters, I’m going to focus on other types of investment (RE, small business, intellectual property, etc.) and less on 401ks and SEPPs. I’m only going to contribute as much to my SEPP as I believe makes good sense from a taxation standpoint. For example, if I owe $3,000 in taxes but I contribute $10,000 to my SEPP, then I owe $0 in taxes.
Now, I could pay the $3,000 in taxes and invest the remaining $7,000 in something that will not only return enough to make up for the $3,000 paid in taxes, but also outpace the return of the SEPP fund thereafter (the latter being the decidedly less difficult task), but if I knew what investment does both, I could reach my number in a significantly shorter time frame!
Though maybe I’m way off base with this. Adrian has made intriguing arguments for not contributing to a 401k that the company matches (a practice that most pundits deem as a “no brainer”), so maybe my logic is flawed with my tax theory too! What do you think?
Ryan, this is a point that I’ve been pondering as well lately. I’ve almost exclusively been a tax-advantaged investor.
I think for me it will come down to my time horizon for the money being invested. If I think I will need it early (before a 59 1/2 retirement) then maybe it will need to be invested outside a 401K, IRA etc.
For most of us, the dates we selected for our Numbers (and subsequent withdrawals) are before 59 1/2. Mine puts me just short of my 50th birthday. That alone should be enough to convince me of changing my strategy, but old habits are hard to break.